![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
`Year 6 Sailors
`caroline `christianne `colin cheng `colin ho `daniel `gerard `greg `irenaeus `jessica `julius `kwong `melissa `michael `victor `weiling-crescent `weiling-nanyang `xinling `zelanie `Year 5 Sailors
`andrew `eugene `damian `wilson `bryan `seng `charles `deborah `christine `amanda `maye `jaime `shawn `deon `archives July 2006 August 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 `links `tag |
Saturday, June 10, 2006 just for interest sake especially ms. sloth. im sorry for using up so much space. colin ho Sun protection factorThe SPF (sun protection factor) of a sunscreen is a laboratory measure of the effectiveness of sunscreen; the higher the SPF, the more protection a sunscreen offers against UVB (the ultraviolet radiation that causes sunburn) and UVA (more associated with longer-term skin damage). SPF is the inverse of the proportion of UVB that penetrates the sunscreen: Substituting equation (1) into (2): Thus a sunscreen with an SPF of x blocks a proportion (x−1)/x of UVB:
In theory, the SPF is a multiplier that can be applied to the time taken to burn. For example, someone who would burn after 12 minutes in the sun would expect to burn after 2 hours (120 min) if protected by a sunscreen with SPF 10. In practice, the protection from a particular sunscreen depends on factors such as:
The SPF is an imperfect measure of skin damage because invisible damage and skin aging is also caused by the very common ultraviolet type A, which does not cause reddening or pain. Conventional sunscreen does not block UVA as effectively as UVB, and an SPF rating of 30+ may translate to significantly lower levels of UVA protection according to a 2003 study by RAFT trust-funded researchers. Some broad spectrum sunscreens do provide significant UVA protection. According to a 2004 study, UVA also causes DNA damage to cells deep within the skin, increasing the risk of malignant melanomas. Due to consumer confusion over the real degree and duration of protection offered, labeling restrictions are in force in several countries. In the United States in 1999, the FDA decided to institute the labelling of SPF 30+ for sunscreens offering more protection, and a similar restriction applies in Australia. This was done to discourage companies making unrealistic claims about the level of protection offered (such as "all day protection"), and because an SPF over 30 does not provide significantly better protection. Adapted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_protection_factor acsailing at 11:23 PM
| ||||||||||||